Distinctions - Kodak’s most interesting feature on the Ektar H35 is the half-frame shooting mechanism, which allows two pictures to be taken on a single frame of 35mm film. While this does compress the image somewhat for those looking for finer detail, it is also a great option for those looking for analog styling on a budget. The flash, in our experience, was competent in shorter range distances. The small feature suite is easy to understand, with the flash ring being intuitive to operate.

Criticisms - The Kodak Ektar H35 is by no means an incredibly versatile camera. Photos taken from a distance are often hard to make out details due to little depth-of-field and half-frame image size. Similarly, the brightness of the flash is not adjustable, making some portrait shots, particularly at night, washed out by glare. The Ektar H35 also runs off of disposable batteries, which incur a maintenance cost fairly regularly. Point-and-shoot film cameras often offer similar experiences for less up-front cost.

Distinctions - Color and prints associated with the design of the Kodak Ektar H35 are very visually appealing, using soft to rich hues that fit a more classical, analog aesthetic. Tactile buttons do allow for solid use without constant visual readjustment.

Criticisms - Thin plastic and weak panel gaps on the Kodak Ektar H35 are a tremendous downfall, with durability being a major issue. While marketed as a camera for the on-the-go enthusiast, damage can often be easily incurred during regular transport of the Ektar H35, particularly to the outer shell, which is very necessary to the function of the actual aperture. Light bleed caused by damage or space between shell components can ruin image quality, and did with our particular tests. While the ‘reusability’ of the Kodak Ektar H35 is a marketing point, it remains a genuine question whether the model would survive long enough to offset the higher cost compared to, say, regular disposable film cameras.

Distinctions - Overall, design language incorporated into the Kodak Ektar H35 camera is very much cohesive and appealing, especially when combined with the color choices available. Rounded corners, clear and distinct separations between color choices and an overall utilitarian sense of beauty evoke predecessors from earlier days, like the Brownie cameras after which some of the styling takes.

Criticisms - Visibly the Kodak Ektar H35 is not made of high-quality materials like the metals or durable shells of more historic 35mm cameras, and stands out when placed amongst peers. Dull lusters of plastic, while more colorful, do make the Ektar H35 look more like a toy when compared to all metal bodies of competitors.

Distinctions - Half-frame shooting offered on the Kodak Ektar H35 allows for twice the photos to be taken on a single roll of film, reducing consumer expense and the footprint of film development, which is always welcome.

Criticisms - Lackluster material quality causes the Kodak Ektar H35 to be irreparably damaged much sooner than other 35mm cameras, even those from decades prior. A lack of interchangeable lenses means those looking for a different shooting style may need to seek an alternative purchase, or will grow out of the Ektar H35 faster than expected. Disposable battery reliance, especially when Kodak does have some rechargeable options, is particularly disappointing.

Distinctions - Few distinctions; use of half-frame shooting is unique and increasingly harder to find in brand-new entry-level cameras. Color options are unique, however, buyers purchasing purely on the grounds of aesthetic appeal should be advised that in-person material quality is plainly visible.

Criticisms - Better material quality is found in many other competitors, particularly for less money in second-hand 35mm cameras. For those looking for a vintage aesthetic, why not buy actually competent vintage for less money and an authentic look? The Kodak Ektar H35 is targeted at those looking to break into the hobby who want to fit a particular look but do not know enough about film photography to discern they could get more for less.